ā®ļø Last week: What are your thoughts on toll roads?
A) 17% ā Letās do it.
B) 22% ā Only at the borders.
C) 28% ā Willing to hear more.
D) 33% ā Never.
Herb in Cottage Grove has a typical (D) response: “Not only should all roads be open roads to travelers, but their building and maintenance should be a straight-forward line item in the budget disassociated from the gas tax. We know the revenue from gasoline is going to disappear with the adoption of electric and hydrogen vehicles, so let’s prepare for it.”
āļø This Week: As noted in one of this weekās stories (below), Wisconsin governors have had partial veto powers unlike almost anywhere else. While a traditional veto only allows for the rejection of a bill in its entirety, Wisconsinās partial veto has allowed governors to strike sections of bills, individual provisions, even single letters and numbers sometimes.
There are some who believe this gives a duly-elected governor the latitude to sign modified bills into law without having to veto the whole thing and force the Legislature to start over. Others believe a governor should only be allowed a straight up-or-down veto.
(And let’s be honest, others change their answer⦠depending on whether their party controls the governorās post!)
What do you think Wisconsin governors should have?
A) Unlimited partial veto power. It prevents reckless legislation.
B) Leave the partial veto as-is. Numbers can be selectively vetoed, but you canāt veto individual letters or words to create new sentences.
C) No more partials: a straight all-or-nothing veto.
To answer this weekās question, hit reply or email me directly at pat@couriernewsroom.com, and we may share it in a future newsletter or on UpNorthNews Radio.