Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul (AP Photo/Morry Gash)
The new motion says no further oral arguments are needed for the court to make a final judgment that the 19th century law is about feticide and does not criminalize abortion.
Days into the tenure of a state Supreme Court now under liberal control, Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul filed a motion on Monday asking a Dane County court to rule that an 1849 state law does not in fact ban abortion in Wisconsin..
“Women should not be denied the freedom to make fundamental reproductive health-care decisions,” said Kaul in a statement. “Our filing today marks another important step in our fight to protect the freedom and safety of women in Wisconsin.”
Kaul believes Judge Diane Schlipper will reiterate her ruling from last month that “there is no such thing as an 1849 abortion ban in Wisconsin” because the 19th century statute applies to the illegal killing of fetuses by assaulting or battering the mother and not abortions.
Schlipper’s ruling—that a district attorney would have no authority to bring criminal charges under the 1849 statute—applied only to a motion filed by Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski seeking to dismiss the lawsuit filed last year by Kaul, three physicians, and others seeking a clear legal answer on the status of the 1849 statute versus more recent laws.
Schlipper denied Urmanski’s motion to dismiss and said the state’s “Abortion Prevention and Family Responsibility Act of 1985” allows pre-viability abortions and post-viability abortions “if the abortion is necessary to preserve the life or health of the woman, as determined by reasonable medical judgment of the woman’s attending physician.”
Viability refers to the point at which a fetus can survive outside the womb and is generally considered to be around 23 or 24 weeks.
Kaul is now asking Schlipper to rule on the full lawsuit without any further oral arguments, once an expedited briefing is completed.
Whenever Schlipper issues a final judgment, an appeals process will almost certainly take the case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which had been controlled by conservative justices for more than 15 years until last week’s swearing-in of Justice Janet Protasiewicz, giving liberals a 4-3 majority.
Protasiewicz repeatedly stated during her campaign this spring that she personally believed abortion should be legal, though she stopped short of saying how she would rule on the specifics of any given case that came before the court.
Author
Politics
Justices hear arguments to undo years of gerrymandered maps in Wisconsin
Swiss cheese legislative districts: “Wisconsin is the only state that has anything that looks anything like this.” Pro-democracy advocates pleaded...
Opinion: It’s open enrollment time for Medicare, and it’s better than ever thanks to changes by Biden and Baldwin
The Inflation Reduction Act ended 30 years of taxpayers not being able to use their buying power to get lower prices from big drug companies....
Local News
6 Wisconsin-invented cheeses every board needs
As Wisconsinites, it’s our duty to not only spread cheer, but cheese this holiday season! Whether you’re hosting or heading out of town, what’s...
Save money on your power bill with these Black Friday energy-saving deals
Black Friday is the ultimate shopping extravaganza, offering massive discounts on everything from electronics to fashion. While it’s tempting to...
