Environment

Company Kills Wolf River Mine Plans, But Will Continue Exploration ‘Within the Region’

The first exploratory drilling in Wisconsin since 2012 comes up empty for the mining company.

#image_title

The first exploratory drilling in Wisconsin since 2012 comes up empty for the mining company.

Mining company Badger Minerals has dropped plans for further exploratory drilling at a site in rural Oneida County near the headwaters of the Wolf River, according to reports from WXPR and the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. 

Badger Minerals wrapped up a round of minor test drilling at the end of June as it sought to determine whether the wooded land in the town of Schoepke contained enough valuable sulfide minerals such as gold and silver to warrant a mining operation there. The prospect of a sulfide mine in the largely pristine Northwoods worried nearby landowners and environmentalists who feared pollution from such an operation would have negative impacts on the ecology along the Wolf River and beyond.

โ€œI think everybody in the Northwoods can take a collective sigh and relax a little bit right now,โ€ said Ron Zabler, whose family owns property adjacent to the test-drilling site.

Badger Mineralsโ€™ test drilling was the first in Wisconsin since 2012 and the first in Oneida County since the 1980s. The company was able to do so because the stateโ€™s โ€œprove it firstโ€ lawโ€”which required corporations to prove their mines would not cause pollution or environmental damage before they started drillingโ€”was repealed in 2017 under former Republican Gov. Scott Walker. US Rep. Tom Tiffany, the former Republican state senator for the area who is up for reelection Nov. 3 for his Congressional seat, played a large role in the effort by pushing a pro-mining agenda.

Eric Quigley, Badger Mineralsโ€™ senior geologist, told UpNorthNews in an email that the drilling at Schoepke was done on two different tracts of land: one owned by Badger Minerals and another that the company considered buying. Quigley said the company decided not to buy the land it does not currently own.

However, Badger Minerals owns other land in the area and plans to continue mining exploration in Oneida County and elsewhere โ€œwithin the region,โ€ Quigley wrote.

โ€œDepending on the success of these exploration efforts, it is likely that additional drilling could be conducted in the future,โ€ Quigley wrote.

Even if Badger Minerals had decided to move ahead with a mine, it would have been as long as a decade before the plans came to fruition. Although the โ€œprove it firstโ€ law was repealed, there are still stringent regulations under state statutes and Department of Natural Resources regulations. Further, only a tiny fraction of test-drilling operationsโ€”between 1 in 5,000 and 1 in 10,000, according to the US Forest Serviceโ€”ever become a mine.

However, a comment Quigley made to WXPR has raised eyebrows among locals: He said Badger Minerals owns lands nearby in Schoepke and may try drilling at those sites.

โ€œItโ€™s not over,โ€ said Ron James, who owns land downstream from Schoepke in Langlade County. โ€œIt looks like we have a little break for now, but as long as the minerals are in the ground and they know that thereโ€™s something down there, thereโ€™ll be continued activity.โ€

Sulfide mining can pose โ€œseveral significant environmental risks,โ€ according to the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, because sulfuric acid is released during the mining process. A 2012 study of 14 of the nationโ€™s 16 copper sulfide mines found that all 14  have had at least one containment failure such as pipeline breaches and overflows that released sulfuric acid into the surrounding environment.

Eric Rempala, an aircraft mechanic and self-described water quality activist from Irma who owns land in Oneida County, said that while it feels like locals got a small victory, the Schoepke site wonโ€™t be the last test drilling in the Northwoods. He said he and other locals will not feel their land is secure until the โ€œprove it firstโ€ law is reinstated.

โ€œWe feel like this is more a reprieve than anything else,โ€ Rempala said. โ€œIt hasnโ€™t changed anything as far as legislation.โ€